Something went wrong on our end
-
Jean Chalard authored
If allowsAutoCorrected is false, there is no point in making hasAutoCorrection true, since in the only place where we use it again, it's &&'ed with allowsAutoCorrected ! Well that was extremely obscure, good thing refactoring allowed to realize this was useless >.> Change-Id: I34936d445f1ced17c7bd04a9524bf608f9e8b9c8
Jean Chalard authoredIf allowsAutoCorrected is false, there is no point in making hasAutoCorrection true, since in the only place where we use it again, it's &&'ed with allowsAutoCorrected ! Well that was extremely obscure, good thing refactoring allowed to realize this was useless >.> Change-Id: I34936d445f1ced17c7bd04a9524bf608f9e8b9c8
java NaN GiB