@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ We started out by making substantial grants to open source projects and funding
We've since pivoted to building software internally. FUTO now exists to make things good for programmers who want to create non-abusive software. We're getting better results.
We launched [Grayjay](https://grayjay.app) in 2023 October and all of a sudden I learn all about the OSI and semantic arguments going on in the "open source community". Many people feel like we have mislead them. I can assure you that was never our intention.
We launched [Grayjay](https://grayjay.app) in 2023 October and all of a sudden I learn all about the OSI and semantic arguments going on in the "open source community". Many people feel like we have mislead them. I can assure you that was never our intention. The OSI is wrong and it is they who have mislead people.
We have determined that while "open source" still applies to what we're doing, it's caused confusion because the OSI claims ownership of the term and has a very narrow definition. While I regret any miscommunication on our part, I don't think the OSI should have continued to pretend like they owned the term after they lost their trademark. They should have pivoted to a new term that they could trademark if they wanted to behave this way.
